DCSproduction, Website Design in San Jose, SF Bay Area » Search Engine Optimization

Search Engine Optimization (SEO) for large quantity of products in your online store

Alex Hu — Mon, 13 Jun 2011 02:30:51 +0000

Industrial suppliers online stores have a special need. Their products are offered in a single picture, but each item varies in size, material, or functional specification. Helping online shoppers locate your store and the page that displays the closest match to their search is a big challenge. Indeed, improved SEO is essential for automobile industries and companies selling after-market parts, machine parts, manufactural supplies, and safety signs online. DCS has the answer.

Your online store sells items with similar looks but different details, and their differences can be described in fixed patterns. Say your store also has a long list of stock items with similar needs. DCS has come up with a new approach and recently delivered a case of this nature. As evidenced by traffic reports and online sales, we think our approach is noteworthy.

Google search: site:weneedsigns.com. You will get 6,420 results. Within 1 to 2 month after the new Safety Sign department been introduced online, online shopper google for ANSI, OSHA, or bilingual safety signs, they should always see the item listings from WeNeedSigns on the 1st page of search results.

Similar demands are found in automobile after-market parts and accessories. Most of these parts have only one look, but there are minor differences for different years and models.

Also, many industrial suppliers have similar needs. Their products all look the same in picture, but each item varies by size, material, or functional specification. In our case, the client is providing Safety Signs in the store. Any Safety Sign Face, i.e. icon + text message (eg. Danger: High Voltage) needs 16 types of size and material combination. If the store carries 500+ safety sign faces, its stock item could easily goes up to 8,000 items.

Many stores use the X-cart option and the variant feature to answer the above needs. DCS has different approaches to this issue. Here is why:
1) The X-cart user manual, in the variant section, tells you that heavily reliance on the variant feature in your online store dramatically impacts and slows down server performance. As we have about, 500 sets of products, use of the variant option would be inefficient.

2) Considering search engine optimization (SEO). The closer the match the greater the chance and specific search will be found. That is, when we use the product title “Danger – High Voltage , Safety Aluminum Sign, 08″ x 12″”, the product has a much higher chance to be directly located than if it were named “Danger – High Voltage Safety Sign.”

3) To support this SEO design, DCS has developed a mass item production and management tool. With A few simply clicks, store managers can generate hundreds of products, and afterward, adjust hundreds of product prices based on changes in materials and other details of the product. It is an efficient tool in handling mass quantities of products.
Feel free to call Alex Hu for a special SEO design that catering your need.
(408) 929-4888

Transportation Site SEO updates

Alex Hu — Thu, 02 Sep 2010 05:18:27 +0000

Search engine optimization (SEO) is the last mile, the critical bridge, between businesses and their targeted customers. With the huge amount of new web content appearing on the internet every day, a website undiscovered is a website wasted.

DCS Production believes that the SEO strategy should be well planned from initiation– an embedded component in its website design. Successfully established SEO brings benefits:

Website owners will not have to worry about whether their website contents can be located in the search results of search engines such as Google or Bing, and many other SEs.
The site’s organic ranking (search engine results ranking without pay for it) will improve over time.
With SEO website structure built, the posting of new website content will guarantee more frequent appearance in search engine results.

In 2008, DCS production rebuilt the website of eCharterBus, a tour and transportation service provider based on San Francisco. Since then, eCharterBus has received consistent Internet leads from its online inquiry form.

The Conversion Funnel calculation determines the success of a SEO campaign:

Number of visitors to the website *
conversion rate (%) of visitors who sent in inquiries *
conversion rate (%) of service providers successfully nailing the deals

Feedback from the client reveals that they are confident in their conversion rate as a small-scale website and company. They were most interested in the improvement of their organic ranking, i.e. more presence, and higher ranking. Also, they hoped to get their website ready before investing in Google AdWords.

Our client first provided a list of what they can offer in group transportation and revealed where their competitive strength lies. DCS Production researched search engine behavior and tested from real search results.

We generated a huge pool of optimized keywords from all aspects of group transportation. With the material ready, DCS copywriters wrote the service description page in 15 subsets. We confirmed with the client that this method provides the best and most accurate web presentation of eChartBus.

Publishing these newly SEO-based pages is not the last step. Adjustment and tracking is the 2nd part of the task. We will cover more details in a few months.

Alleged Negative SEO Ranking Factors

admin — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 04:12:01 +0000

2. Alleged Negative ON-Page SEO Google Ranking Factors (24)
Factor #	NEGATIVE ON-Page SEO Factors	Brief Note
39	Text presented in graphics form only No ACTUAL body text on the page	Text represented graphically is invisible to search engines.
40	Affiliate site?	The Florida update went after affiliates with a vengeance – flower and travel affiliates were hit hard – cookie-cutter sites with massive inter-linking, but little unique content. Subsequent updates have also targeted affiliates.
41	Over optimization penalty (OOP)	Penalty for over-compliance with well-established, accepted web optimization practices. Too high keyword repetition (keyword stuffing) may get you the OOP. Overuse of H1 tags has been mentioned. Meta-tag stuffing.
42	Link to a bad neighborhood	Don’t link to link farms, FFAs (Free For All’s) Also, don’t forget to check the Google status of EVERYONE you link to periodically. A site may go “bad”, and you can end up being penalized, even though you did nothing. For instance, some failed real estate sites have been switched to p0rn by unscrupulous webmasters, for the traffic. This is not good for you, if you are linking to the originally legitimate URL.
43	Redirect thru refresh metatags	Don’t immediately send your visitor to another page other than the one he/ she clicked on, using meta refresh.
44	Vile language – ethnic slur	Including the George Carlin 7 bad words you can’t say on TV, plus the 150 or so that followed. Don’t shoot yourself right straight in the foot. Also, avoid combinations of normal words, which when used together, become something else entirely – such as the word juice, and the word l0ve. See why I wrote that zero? I don’t even want to get a proximity penalty, either. Paranoia, or caution? You decide. I always want to try to put my “best foot forward”.
45	Poison words	The word “Links” in a title tag has been suggested to be a bad idea. Here is my list of Poison Words for Adsense. This penalty has been loosened – many of these words now appear in normal context, with no problems. But watch your step.
46	Excessive cross-linking
47	Stealing images/ text blocks from another domain	Copyright violation – Google responds strongly if you are reported. ref egol File Google DMCA
48	Keyword stuffing threshold	In body, meta tags, alt text, etc. = demotion
49	Keyword dilution	Targeting too many unrelated keywords on a page, which would detract from theming, and reduce the importance of your REALLY important keywords.
50	Page edit – can reduce consistency	Google patent - Google is now switching between a “newer” cache, and several “older” caches, frequently drawing from BOTH at the same time. This was possibly implemented to frustrate SERP manipulators. Did your last edit substantially alter your keywords, or theme? Expect noticeable SERP bouncing.
51	Frequency of Content Change	Google patent – Too frequent = bad
52	Freshness of Anchor Text	Google patent – Too frequent = bad
53	Dynamic Pages	Problematic – know pitfalls – shorten URLs, reduce variables, lose the session IDs
54	Excessive Javascript	Don’t use for redirects, or hiding links
55	Flash page – NOT	Most (all-?) SE spiders can’t read Flash content Provide an HTML alternative, or experience lower SERP positioning.
56	Use of Frames	Spidering Problems with Frames – STILL
57	Robot exclusion “no index” tag	Intentional self-exclusion
58	Single pixel links	A red flag – one reason only – a sneaky link.
59	Invisible text	OK – No penalty – Google advises against this. (The text is the same color as the background, and hence cannot be seen by the viewer, but can be visible to the search engine spiders.) I believe Google does penalize for hidden text, since it is an attempt to manipulate rank. Although they don’t catch everyone.
60	Gateway, doorway page (I see changes here – not only does the doorway page disappear, but the main page gets pushed down, as well – this is a welcome fix.)	OK – No penalty – Google advises against this. Google used to reward these pages.
61	Duplicate content (YOUR’S)	OK – No penalty – Google advises against this. Google picks one (usually the oldest), and shoves it to the top, and pushes the second choice down. This has been a big issue with stolen content – the thief usurps your former position with YOUR OWN content.
62	HTML code violations (The big G does not even use DOCTYPE declarations, required for W3C validation.)	Doesn’t matter – Google advises against this. Unless of course, the page is totally FUBAR. Simple HTML verification is NOT required (but advised, since it could contribute to your page quality factor – PQF).
	Since the above 4 items are so controversial, I would like to add this comment: There are many things that Google would LIKE to have webmasters do, but that they simply cannot control, due to logistical considerations. Their only alternative is to foment fear and doubt by implying that any violation of their “suggestions” will result in swift and fierce demotion. (This is somewhat dated – G is fixing these things.)	IN GENERAL, this works pretty well to keep webmasters in line. The fallacy of this is that attentive webmasters can readily observe continuing, blatant exceptions to these official pronouncements. There are many anecdotes about Goggle “taking care” of a problem. Google states that they do not provide hand-tweaked “boosts”, but are silent about hand-tweaked demotions. They occur, for sure. To believe otherwise is naive. Wouldn’t YOU swat the most obnoxious flies? I would. It is becoming easier to determine the best thing to do. Try to avoid any Google penalties or demotions.
119	Phrase-based ranking, filters, penalties	Feb. 2007 – Google patent granted. Do not use phrases that have been associated and correlated with known spamming techniques, or you will be penalized. What phrases? Ahh, you tell me.

Alleged NEGATIVE OFF-Page SEO Google Ranking Factors (13)
Note	Factor #	NEGATIVE OFF-Page SEO Factors	Brief Note
-	120 (added)	Traffic Buying	Have you paid a company for web traffic? It is probably low quality traffic, with a zero conversion rate. Some providers of traffic for traffic’s sake may be considered “bad neighborhoods”. Can Google discount your traffic (for true popularity), because they know it’s mostly phony? Have you read about Traffic Power?
22-29	106	Temporal Link Analysis	In a nut shell, old links are valued, new links are not. This is intended to thwart rapid incoming link accumulation, accomplished through the tactic of link buying. Just one of the sandbox factors.
18	107	Change of Meanings	Query meaning changes over time, due to current events
BAD	108	Zero links to you	You MUST have at least 1 (one) incoming link (back link) from some website somewhere, that Google is aware of, to REMAIN in the index.
BAD	109	Link-buying (Very good IF you don’t get caught, but don’t do it - when caught, the penalty isn’t worth it.)	Google patent – Google hates link-buying, because it corrupts their PR model in the worst way possible. 1. Does your page have links it really doesn’t merit? 2. Did you get tons of links in a short time period? 3. Do you have links from high-PR, unrelated sites?
41, 42	110	Prior Site Ranking	Google patent – High = Good
BAD	111	Cloaking	Google promises to Ban! (Presenting one webpage to the search engine spider, and another webpage to everybody else.)
	112	Links from bad neighborhoods, affiliates	Google says that incoming links from bad sites can’t hurt you, because you can’t control them. Ideally, this would be true. However, some speculate otherwise, esp., when other associated factors are thrown into the mix, such as web rings.
BAD	113	Penalties – resulting from Domain Hijacking (work with Google to fix)	Should result in IMPRISONMENT, forthwith! Grand Theft, mandatory minimum sentence. The criminal COPIES your entire website, and HOSTS it elsewhere, with . . . a few changes.
-	114	Penalty – Google TOS violation	WMG is the worst offender – gobbles up tons of Google server time by nervous Nellie webmasters. Google even mentions them by name. I think that Google will spank you when you cross the threshold, of say, 100 queries per day for the same term, from the same IP. Google can block your IP. Get a Google API.
	115	Server Reliability – S/B >99.9%	What is your uptime? Ever notice a daily time when your server is unavailable, like about 1:30 AM? How diligent must Googlebot be? This is the worst reason to get dropped – you just aren’t there! An ISP maintenance interruption can cause delisting..
-	116	No more room Pages being dropped from large sites	Google now has over 8 Gigs of indexed pages. Thousands of pages are disappearing from various huge websites, but I think that it is G just cleaning house, by dumping computer-generated pages.
HOT	117	Rank Manipulation by Competitor Attack (1. Content theft causing you to get a duplicate content penalty, even though your content is the original. People are still stealing my content, but nobody trumps me (in Google) with my own content – hats off to Google.) Examples - Site-Wide Link Attack and 302 Redirect Attack and Hijacker Attack	Impossible by Google definition (except for a few nasty tricks, like making your competition appear to be link spammers) Ideally, there SHOULD be nothing that your competition can do to directly hurt your rankings. However, an astute observer noticed that Google changed their website to read : Old verbiage = “There is nothing a competitor can do to harm your ranking …” New verbiage = “There is ALMOST nothing a competitor can do …” An obvious concession that Google thinks that at least some dirty tricks work! Of course, there will always be new ones!
-	118	Bouncing Ball Algorithm	G has moved to a daily dance. Multiple changing factors are applied daily. GOOD LUCK NOW on trying to figure things out! IN ADDITION, some the above factors are being “tweaked” daily. Not only are the “weights” of the factors changed, but the formula itself changes. Change is the only constant. An algo change can boost or demote your site. I put this in the negative factors section, because your position is never secure, unless of course, you are huge (PR=7 or greater). If you simply cannot achieve top position, your only alternative to first page SERP exposure may be Google Ad Words (you pay for exposure). Today, I searched for an extremely competitive “2-word term”, and I found that NOT ONE of the top ten Google SERPs had even one of the words on the page. YOWSA! Today’s theory – when it doesn’t matter, anybody can get #1 in a second, if they know the on-page rules. BUT, after a certain “commercial competitive level”, the “semantic analysis” algo kicks in, and less becomes more. The keyword density rules are flipped upon their noggins. I think that we are witnessing the evolution of search engine anti-seo sophistication, right before our very eyes. Fun stuff.

Top

Alleged Positive SEO Ranking Factors

admin — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 03:24:33 +0000

Alleged Positive ON-Site SEO Ranking Factors
Factor #.	POSITIVE ON-Site SEO Factors.	Brief Information.
1.	KEYWORDS.	Google patent – Topic extraction For keyword selection, try – Google Trends.
1-1.	Keyword in URL.	First word is best, second is second best, etc..
1-2.	Keyword in Domain name.	Same as in page-name-with-hyphens..
1-3.	Keywords – Header.	Keyword in Title tag – close to beginning Title tag 10 – 60 characters, no special characters..
2.	Keyword in Title tag.	.
2-1.	Keyword in Description meta tag.	Shows theme of web site – less than 200 chars. Google no longer “relies” upon this tag, but will often use it..
2-2.	Keyword in Keyword meta tag.	Shows theme – less than 10 words. Every word in this tag MUST appear somewhere in the body text. If not, it can be penalized for irrelevance. No single word should appear more than twice. If not, it may be considered spam. Google purportedly no longer uses this tag, but others do..
3.	Keywords – Body.	.
3-1.	Keyword density in body text.	5 – 20% – (all keywords/ total words) Some report topic sensitivity – the keyword spamming threshold % varies with the topic..
3-2.	Individual keyword density.	1 – 6% – (each keyword/ total words)..
3-3.	Keyword in H1, H2 and H3.	Use H(x) font style tags appropriately..
3-4.	Keyword font size.	Strong is treated the same as bold, italic is treated the same as emphasis..
3-5.	Keyword proximity (for 2+ keywords).	Directly adjacent is best..
3-6.	Keyword phrase order.	Does word order in the page match word order in the query? Try to anticipate query, and match word order..
3-7.	Keyword prominence (how early in page/tag) .	Can be important at top of page, in bold, in large font.
4.	Keywords – Other.	.
4-1.	Keyword in alt text.	Should describe graphic – Do NOT fill with spam (Was part of Google Florida OOP – tripped a threshold – may still be in effect to some degree as a red flag, when summed with all other on-page optimization – total page optimization score – TPOS)..
4-2.	Keyword in links to site pages (anchor text).	Links out anchor text use keyword?.
5.	NAVIGATION – INTERNAL LINKS.	.
5-1.	To internal pages- keywords?.	Link should contain keywords. The filename “linked to” should contain the keywords. Use hyphenated filenames, but not long ones – two or three hyphens only..
5-2.	All Internal links valid?.	Validate all links to all pages on site..
5-3.	Efficient – tree-like structure.	TRY FOR two clicks to any page – no page deeper than 4 clicks..
5-4.	Intra-site linking.	Appropriate links between lower-level pages..
6.	NAVIGATION – OUTGOING LINKS.	.
6-1.	To external pages- keywords?.	Google patent – Link only to good sites. Do not link to link farms. CAREFUL – Links can and do go bad, resulting in site demotion. Unfortunately, you must devote the time necessary to police your outgoing links – they are your responsibility..
6-2.	Outgoing link Anchor Text.	Google patent – Should be on topic, descriptive..
6-3.	Link stability over time.	Google patent – Avoid “Link Churn”..
6-4.	All External links valid?.	Validate all links periodically..
6-5.	Less than 100 links out total.	Google says limit to 100, but readily accepts 2-3 times that number. ref 2k.
7.	OTHER ON-Page Factors.	.
7-1.	Domain Name Extension (Top Level Domain – TLD).	.govsites seem to be the highest status .edusites seem to be given a high status .orgsites seem to be given a high status .comsites excel in encompassing all the spam/ crud sites, resulting in the need for the highest scrutiny/ action by Google. Perhaps one would do well with the new .info domain class.
7-2.	File Size.	Try not to exceed 100K page size (however, some subject matter, such as this page, requires larger file sizes). Smaller files are preferred <40K (lots of them)..
7-3.	Hyphens in URL .	Preferred method for indicating a space, where there can be no actual space One or two= excellent for separating keywords (i.e., pet-smart, pets-mart) Four or more= BAD, starts to look spammy Ten = Spammer for sure, demotion probable?.
7-4.	Freshness of Pages.	Google patent – Changes over time Newer the better – if news, retail or auction! Google likes fresh pages.
7-5.	Freshness – Amount of Content Change.	New pages – Ratio of old pages to new pages..
7-6.	Freshness of Links.	Google patent – May be good or bad Excellent for high-trust sites May not be so good for newer, low-trust sites..
7-7.	Frequency of Updates.	Frequent updates = frequent spidering = newer cache..
7-8.	Page Theming.	Page exhibit theme? General consistency?.
7-9.	Keyword stemming.	Stem, stems, stemmed, stemmer, stemming, stemmist, stemification..
7-10.	Applied Semantics.	Synonyms, CIRCA white paper .
7-11.	LSI.	Latent Semantic Indexing – Speculation, no proof yet.
7-12.	URL length.	Keep it minimized – use somewhat less than the 2,000 characters allowed by IE – less than 100 is good, less is even better..
8.	OTHER ON- SITE Factors.	.
8-1.	Site Size – Google likes big sites.	Larger sites are presumed to be better funded, better organized, better constructed, and therefore better sites. Google likes LARGE sites, for various reasons, not all positive. This has resulted in the advent of machine-generated 10,000-page spam sites – size for the sake of size. Google has caught on and dumped millions of pages, or made them supplemental..
8-2.	Site Age.	Google patent – Old is best. Old is Golden..
8-3.	Age of page vs. age of site.	Age of page vs. age of other pages on site Newer pages on an older site will get faster recognition..

Alleged POSITIVE OFF-Page SEO Google Ranking Factors (43)
Factor #	POSITIVE OFF-Page SEO Factors	Brief Note
INCOMING LINKS :
63	Page Rank	Based on the Number and Quality of links to you Google link reporting continues to display just a SMALL fraction of your actual backlinks, and they are NOT just greater than PR4 – they are mixed.
64	Total incoming links (“backlinks”)	Historically, FAST counted best (www.alltheweb.com). No more – Yahoo (parent) broke it. In Yahoo search, type in: linksite:www.domain-name.com linkdomain:www.domainname.com Try MSN - http://beta.search.msn.com Use link:www.domainname.com Current TYPICAL Backlink Reporting Ratios- Google – 30 links MSN – 1,000 links Yahoo – 3,000 links
65	Incoming links from high-ranking pages	In 2004, Google used to count (report) the links from all PR4+ pages that linked to you. In 2005-2006, Google reported only a small fraction of the links, in what seemed like an almost random manner. In Feb. 2007, Google markedly upgraded (increased) the number of links that they report.
66	Acceleration of link popularity (“. . . used to be a good thing” … Martha)	Google patent Link acquisition speed boost – speculative Too fast = artificial? Cause of -30 penalty? Sandbox penalty imposed if new site?
FOR EACH INCOMING LINK :
67	Page rank of the referring page	Based on the quality of links to you
68	Anchor text of inbound link to you	Contains keyword, key phrase? #1 result in SERP does NOT EVEN need to have the keyword(s) on the page, ANYWHERE!!! What does that tell you? (Enables Google-bombing- search for “miserable failure”)
69	Age of link	Google patent – Old = Good.
70	Frequency of change of anchor text	Google patent – Not good. Why would you do that?
71	Popularity of referring page	Popularity = desirability, respect
72	# of outgoing links on referrer page	Fewer is better – makes yours more important
73	Position of link on referrer page	Early in HTML is best
74	Keyword density on referring page	For search keyword(s)
75	HTML title of referrer page	Same subject/ theme?
76	Link from “Expert” site?	Google patent – Big time boost (Hilltop Algorithm) Recently reported to give a big boost !
77	Referrer page – Same theme	From the same or related theme? BETTER
78	Referrer page – Different theme	From different or unrelated theme? WORSE
79	Image map link?	Problematic?
80	Javascript link?	Problematic- attempt to hide link?
DIRECTORIES :
81	Site listed in DMOZ Directory? The “Secret Hand” DMOZ Issues 1. Legitimate sites CAN’T GET IN 2. No Accountability 3. Corrupt Editors 4. Competitive Sites Barred 5. Dirty Tricks Employed 6. Rude dmoz editors Flawed concept – communism doesn’t work Free editing? Nothing is free. DMOZ Sucks Discussions DMOZ Problems Discussions The Google Directory is produced by an unknown, ungoverned, unpoliced, ill-intentioned, retaliatory, monopoly enterprise, consisting of profiteering power-ego editors feathering their own nests – the ODP. AOL is making millions, and needs to police it’s run-amok entity. Enough already!	This is a tough one. Google’s directory comes STRAIGHT from the DMOZ directory. You should try to get into dmoz. But you can’t. Be careful whom you approach with the old spondulix - Formal DMOZ Bribe Instructions. It is almost impossible to get into DMOZ. Google needs to DO SOMETHING about populating its own directory with the skewed, incomplete, poorly determined results from the dysfunctional Open Directory Project – the ODP! Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely
82	DMOZ category?	Theme fit category? General or geographic category? Both are possible, and acceptable.
83	Site listed in Yahoo Directory?	Big boost – You can get in by paying $299 each year. Many swear it is worth it – many swear it isn’t.
84	Site listed in LookSmart Directory?	Boost? Another great vote for your site.
85	Site listed in inktomi?	Inktomi has been absorbed internally by Yahoo.
86	Site listed in other directories (About, etc.)	Directory listing boost (If other RESPECTED directories link to you, this must be positive.)
87	Expert site? (Hilltopor Condensed Hilltop)	Large-sized site, quality incoming links
88	Site Age – Old shows stability	Google patent Boost for long-established sites, new pages indexed easily The opposite of the sand box.
89	Site Age – Very New Boost	Temporary boost for very new sites – I estimate that this boost lasts from 1 week to 3 weeks – Yahoo does it too.
90	Site Directory – Tree Structure	Influences SERPs – logical, consistent, conventional
91	Site Mapand more site map	Complete – keywords in anchor text
92	Site Size	Previously, many pages preferred – conferred authority upon site, thus page. Bigger sites = better SERPs Now, fewer pages preferred, due to proliferation of computer-generated pages. Google has been dropping pages like crazy.
93	Site Theming	Site exhibit theme? Use many related terms? Have you used a keyword suggestion tool? A thesaurus?
PAGE METRICS – USER BEHAVIOR: Currently implemented through the Google tool bar?
94	Page traffic	Google patent – # of visitors, trend
95	Page Selection Rate – CTR	Google patent – How often is a page clicked on?
96	Time spent on page	Google patent – Relatively long time = indicates relevance hit
97	Did user Bookmark page?	Google patent – Bookmark = Good
98	Bookmark add/ removal frequency	Google patent – Recent = Good?
99	How they left, where they went	Back button, link clicked, etc.
SITE METRICS – USER BEHAVIOR : Currently implemented through the Google tool bar?
100	Site Traffic	Google patent – # of visitors, increasing trend = good
101	Referrer	Authoritative referrer?
102	Keyword	Keyword searches used to find you
103	Time spent on domain	Relatively long time = indicates relevance hit Add brownie points.
38 DOMAIN OWNER BEHAVIOR :
104	Domain Registration Time	Google patent – Domain Expiration Date Register for 5 years, Google knows you are serious. Register for 1 year, is it a throw-away domain?
105	Are associated sites legitimate?	Google patent – No spam, ownership, etc.

Top

DCSproduction, Website Design in San Jose, SF Bay Area » Search Engine Optimization

Search Engine Optimization (SEO) for large quantity of products in your online store

Transportation Site SEO updates

Alleged Negative SEO Ranking Factors

Alleged Positive SEO Ranking Factors

Alleged Positive ON-Site SEO Ranking Factors